Hand-written diffs with planted bugs. A senior reviewer would catch the same kinds of issues in your loop.
A code review interview tests whether you find the issues a senior engineer must catch before code ships. Examples are race conditions, missing idempotency, silent precision loss, and auth bypasses in a routine-looking diff. Senior Loop writes every PR by hand. Each diff contains specific, production-grade bugs and has a fixed rubric. Your AI-graded score shows what you caught and what you missed, not a vague quality rating.
Companies that hire senior and staff backend engineers often give you a realistic pull request. They ask you to review it as you would at work. You flag bugs, risky assumptions, and missing edge cases in the comments, not only style issues.
Generic checklists do not tell you what you missed. Every PR here has a rubric of planted, specific issues, such as payment double-charges, distributed race conditions, and broken pagination. The AI grader scores your comments against that rubric.
Go, Kotlin, Python, Java, and C#. Topics cover payments, distributed systems, APIs, security, performance, observability, and general backend operations. Senior loops draw from the same topics.
Yes. 3 code reviews are free, and no card is required. That is enough for a full session before you decide to upgrade.
Want the full breakdown of what gets asked and how to structure your answer? Read the code review interview guide.